As an RIA grows, there comes a point when investment management can become a bottleneck.
What worked when you had $25 million or $50 million under management may become increasingly difficult as the firm adds advisors, clients, assets, and more complex portfolios.
That leads to an important question:
Should a growing RIA hire an in-house Chief Investment Officer or use an Outsourced Chief Investment Officer (OCIO)?
We’re about to talk about it all.
But first, welcome to the Fortis Portfolio blog. We provide institutional-grade investment research and portfolio strategies to RIA firms. And the best part about it is that we don’t make your clients feel like they are part of a machine.
And now, onto the main feature!
There isn't one answer that works for every RIA. But for many growing firms, the decision comes down to three things: scale, control, and economics.
An in-house CIO can give an RIA direct control over its investment operation. An outsourced CIO can provide investment expertise, research, portfolio strategies, and ongoing guidance without requiring the RIA to build an entire institutional investment infrastructure internally.
Let's look at the differences.
What Is an Outsourced CIO for an RIA?
An Outsourced Chief Investment Officer, or OCIO, provides investment management capabilities to an RIA without becoming a full-time employee of the advisory firm.
Depending on the arrangement, an OCIO may provide:
- Asset allocation guidance
- Portfolio construction
- Quantitative investment research
- Security selection
- Buy and sell guidance
- Risk analysis
- Investment strategy development
- Portfolio analytics
- Investment committee support
- Client-facing investment communications
The objective isn't necessarily to replace the advisor's role.
It can be exactly the opposite.
The OCIO handles much of the investment machinery behind the scenes, allowing the advisor to spend more time advising clients.
The OCIO manages the investment process. The advisor manages the client relationship.
For many growing RIAs, that division of labor can become increasingly valuable.
What Does an In-House CIO Do?
An in-house CIO is typically a senior employee responsible for overseeing the RIA's investment philosophy and portfolio management process.
Depending on the size of the firm, the CIO may supervise analysts, portfolio managers, traders, or members of an investment committee.
The advantage is obvious: the RIA has a dedicated investment leader sitting inside the organization.
But hiring a CIO doesn't necessarily mean you have built a complete investment operation.
A CIO may still need research tools, data subscriptions, portfolio analytics, trading resources, compliance support, technology, and additional investment personnel.
That's why growing RIAs should look beyond one person's salary when comparing an outsourced CIO with an internal investment team.
The real comparison is often:
OCIO vs. the total cost and complexity of building an institutional-quality investment function internally.
Outsourced CIO vs. In-House CIO: What's the Difference?
The biggest difference is infrastructure.
With an in-house CIO, the RIA is responsible for creating and maintaining the investment infrastructure.
With an OCIO, the firm is essentially accessing investment infrastructure that has already been built.
That distinction matters as an RIA scales.
Consider a firm that grows from $100 million to $300 million in assets.
The firm's investment workload may become considerably more complicated. There are more accounts, more client questions, more portfolio decisions, more advisor requests, and potentially more investment strategies to monitor.
The firm then faces a choice.
Do you continue hiring people and adding investment infrastructure?
Or do you partner with an investment organization that already has those capabilities?
What Are the Advantages of an Outsourced CIO for a Growing RIA?
One of the largest advantages is scalability.
An RIA may be able to grow substantially without adding an equivalent amount of internal investment staff.
That can improve the economics of growth.
Instead of continually expanding the investment department, the RIA can potentially devote more resources to advisors, client service, financial planning, business development, or acquisitions.
A second advantage is access to specialized investment research.
Building rigorous research capabilities takes time and money. A strong OCIO relationship can give advisors access to quantitative research, portfolio analytics, asset allocation guidance, and institutional investment thinking without recreating those capabilities internally.
The third advantage is consistency.
As an RIA grows, portfolio management can become fragmented. Different advisors may start making different investment decisions for similar clients.
An OCIO can help create a more repeatable investment process across the firm.
That doesn't mean every client receives an identical portfolio.
It means investment decisions can originate from a clearly defined philosophy rather than a collection of individual opinions.
What Are the Advantages of Hiring an In-House CIO?
There are situations where hiring internally makes sense.
A sufficiently large RIA may want complete ownership over its investment intellectual property, personnel, technology, and portfolio management process.
An internal CIO may also work well when investments are central to the firm's brand.
For example, if an RIA markets itself primarily around a highly specialized proprietary investment strategy, maintaining that expertise internally may be strategically important.
An in-house CIO can also be closely integrated into leadership discussions and firm culture.
But RIAs should ask an important question:
Do we actually need an in-house CIO, or do we feel that a firm of our size is supposed to have one?
Those are very different things.
Adding senior investment personnel should solve a business problem, not simply make the organizational chart look more impressive.
Is an Outsourced CIO Cheaper Than an In-House CIO?
It can be, but RIAs should compare the total economics, not simply one fee against one salary.
An internal investment operation may involve compensation, benefits, research platforms, market data, analytics software, trading resources, administrative support, and additional personnel.
Those costs can increase as the RIA grows.
OCIO pricing structures vary, so advisors should understand exactly how fees work.
This becomes especially important when pricing is based on assets.
If the OCIO or investment platform charges a percentage of assets, the RIA's investment management costs may rise substantially as the firm grows.
A flat-fee OCIO arrangement can change those economics because costs don't necessarily increase proportionately with assets.
For a rapidly growing RIA, that distinction can become meaningful.
When Should an RIA Consider Outsourcing Its CIO Function?
There isn't a magic AUM number.
Instead, look for operational signals.
You may want to consider an OCIO when advisors are spending too much time managing portfolios, investment research is consuming senior leadership's attention, portfolio decisions are becoming inconsistent, or the firm needs more sophisticated investment capabilities but isn't ready to build a large internal investment team.
Another sign is growth itself.
If your RIA expects to double assets over the next several years, ask:
Can our current investment infrastructure handle twice the assets without twice the complexity?
If the answer is no, the investment model may need to change before the growth arrives.
How Should an RIA Choose an Outsourced CIO?
Transparency should be one of the first criteria.
Advisors should understand what they own and why they own it.
Investment management shouldn't be a black box.
Ask potential OCIO providers how they construct portfolios, measure risk, conduct research, make buy and sell decisions, communicate changes, and support advisors when clients have questions.
Also examine the economics carefully.
How does the OCIO get paid?
Will costs rise as your assets increase?
And perhaps most importantly:
Can your advisors explain the investment strategy to clients in plain English?
A sophisticated investment process isn't particularly useful if nobody can explain it.
Outsourced CIO or In-House CIO: Which Is Better?
For a large RIA with substantial resources and a strategic reason to own its entire investment operation, an in-house CIO can make sense.
For a growing RIA, however, outsourcing can offer another path.
An OCIO can provide institutional-level investment capabilities without requiring the advisory firm to build an institutional investment department from scratch.
That can allow the RIA to concentrate its internal resources on the areas where advisors often create the most value: understanding clients, providing advice, communicating during difficult markets, and building long-term relationships.
The goal isn't simply to outsource investments.
It's to decide where your firm's people should spend their time.
If your competitive advantage is your relationship with clients, it may not make sense to spend years recreating investment infrastructure that already exists elsewhere.
The better question may be:
What should we own internally—and what should we access through a specialist so our firm can scale more intelligently?
Frequently Asked Questions About Outsourced CIOs for RIAs
What is an outsourced CIO for an RIA?
An outsourced CIO provides investment management expertise, research, portfolio construction, analytics, and related investment support to an advisory firm without requiring the RIA to employ a full internal investment team.
What is the difference between an OCIO and an in-house CIO?
An in-house CIO is an employee of the RIA. An OCIO provides investment capabilities externally, potentially giving the RIA access to an established investment infrastructure without building it internally.
When should an RIA consider hiring an OCIO?
An RIA may consider an OCIO when investment management is consuming too much advisor time, the firm needs more sophisticated research capabilities, portfolio management is becoming inconsistent, or rapid growth is putting pressure on the existing investment operation.
Can an OCIO help an RIA scale?
Potentially. Outsourcing investment functions may allow an RIA to increase assets and clients without expanding its internal investment staff at the same rate.
Is an OCIO less expensive than hiring a CIO?
It depends on the provider and fee structure. RIAs should compare OCIO costs with the total cost of an internal investment operation, including personnel, technology, research, data, and supporting resources.
What should an RIA look for in an outsourced CIO?
Look for transparency, a clearly defined investment philosophy, rigorous research, risk management, understandable economics, scalable capabilities, and investment communications that advisors can explain clearly to clients.
Are you ready to hire an OCIO?
If investment responsibilities are beginning to compete with client service, business development, or long-term growth initiatives, it may be time to evaluate whether an OCIO partnership can help your firm scale more efficiently while continuing to deliver a high-quality investment experience.